Cuba to Debate: The Politicization of Online Conversations on Migration in the Cubadebate Site

Main Article Content

Elisa Beatriz Ramírez-Hernández
í‚ngela Cristina Salgueiro-Marques
Luis Mauro Sá-Martino

Abstract

The article discusses elements of the process of politicization of online conversations about migration in the Cuban site Cubadebate. The migration issue in the Cuban imaginary of the revolutionary period becomes a controversial scene that promotes discussion hubs about values, demands, concerns and wishes from the commentators that participate. Through the analysis of content, discussion threads, discursive architecture and the social environment that characterizes this forum, we compare conversations from 2012 and 2017 regarding the development of reciprocity, the formulation of sensitive issues and the extrapolation to external environments. It was demonstrated that to the extent that the subjects improve a logic of communicative interaction, technologically mediated, they have more possibilities of politically getting involved, tend to be more creative in the elaboration of the discourse and proactive in the proposal of solutions to the problems that they have collectively identified. This research aims to contribute to the development of studies on politicization of online conversations in societies that undergo transformations in a political and connectivity culture fields, particularly those not aligned with the patterns of Western democracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ramírez-Hernández, E. B., Salgueiro-Marques, í‚ngela C., & Sá-Martino, L. M. (2019). Cuba to Debate: The Politicization of Online Conversations on Migration in the Cubadebate Site. Razón Y Palabra, 22(3_102), 418–438. Retrieved from https://revistarazonypalabra.org/index.php/ryp/article/view/1266
Section
Varia

References

Armony. A. (2003). Civil Society in Cuba: A Conceptual Approach. In: Crahan. M. Religion, culture, and society: the case of Cuba. A Conference Report. Washington, D.C. Woodrow Wilson Center Reports on the Americas / No. 9. Chapter 2.
Berg, J. (2016). The impact of anonymity and issue controversiality on the quality of online discussion, Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13:1, 37-51.
Chaguaceda, A. (2010). La campana vibrante. Intelectuales, esfera pública y poder en Cuba: balance y perspectivas de un trienio. Contracorriente, 7, 3, 323-360.
Conover, P. & Searing, D. (2005). Studying ‘Everyday Political Talk’ in the Deliberative System. Acta Política, v. 40, p. 269-283.
Dahlberg, L. (2001). The internet and democratic discourse: exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication & Society, v.4, n.4, p. 615-633.
Dahlgren, P. (2005). The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, n.22, pp.147-162.
Freelon, D. G. (2010). Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication. New Media & Society, v. 12, n. 7, p. 1172-1190.
Gamson, W. (1992). Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Graham, T. (2008). Needles in a haystack: a new approach for identifying and assessing political talk in nonpolitical discussion forums. Javnost-the public, Ljubljana, v.15, n. 2, p. 17-36.
Gutmann, A. & Thompson, D. (1999). Democratic Disagreement. In: Macedo, S. (Ed.). Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 243-279.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1987). The Theory of communicative action: vol. II. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalism reason. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hay, C. (2007). Why we hate politics? Cambridge: Polity Press.
Herrera, A. P. (2016). A mídia religiosa na esfera pública em Cuba: o papel desempenhado pela revista Espacio Laical. [Tesis de Maestría]. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Kies, R. (2010). Promises and limits of web-deliberation. New York, NY: Palgrave McMillan.
Leyva, A. & Somohano, A. (2008). Los intelectuales y la esfera política en Cuba: el debate sobre políticas culturales. Temas, 56, 44-55.
Maia, R. C. M. & Rezende T. A. (2016). Respect and Disrespect in Deliberation across the Networked Media Environment: Examining Multiple Paths of Political Talk. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 21, pp. 121–39.
Maia, R. C. M. et al. (2017). Conversação e deliberação sobre questões sensíveis: um estudo sobre o uso das razões que circulam nos media. Galáxia, nº 34, p. 55-72.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Everyday Talk in Deliberative System. In: Macedo, S. (Ed.). Deliberative Politics: essays on democracy and disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 211-239
Marques, A. C. S. (2016). Dimensões do processo comunicativo na deliberação online: trocas argumentativas, criação de cenas dissensuais e construção do sujeito político. In: Mendoça, R. F.; Pereira, M.A. & Filgueiras, F. (Orgs.). Democracia Digital: publicidade, instituições e confronto político. 1ed.Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, v. 1, p. 237-262.
Marques, A. C. S. & Martino, L. M. S. (2016). Aspectos éticos e políticos da conversação online. In: Mídia, ética e esfera pública. Belo Horizonte: PPGCOM UFMG.
Marques, A. C. S. & Martino, L. M. S. (2017). A politização das conversas cotidianas e suas relações com processos deliberativos. Revista da Associação Nacional dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação. E-compós, Brasília, v.20, n.1.
ONEI. Capítulo 17: Tecnología de la información y las comunicaciones. In: Anuario estadístico de Cuba 2016, 2017. Recuperado de: http://www.one.cu/aec2016/17%20Tecnologias%20de%20la%20Informacion.pdf
Ramírez Hernández, E.B. & Padilla Herrera, A. (2017). Desarrollo, alternativas y cambio social desde la comunicación: una mirada al observatorio crítico de Cuba. Commons. Revista de comunicación y ciudadanía digital, v. 6, p. 148-165.
Stromer-Galley, J. (2005). Decoding deliberation online. Paper presented at the Second Conference on Online Deliberation, Palo Alto, California, Mayo de 2005.
Valdés, J. (2009). El espacio y el límite. Instituto Cubano de Investigaciones Culturales Juan Marinello. La Habana: Ruth Casa Editorial.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). Engineering Sociality in a Culture of Connectivity. In: Van Dijck, J. The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford University Press.
Weltevrede, E. & Borra, E. (2016). Platform affordances and data practices: The value of dispute on Wikipedia. Big Data & Society, v. 3, n. 1, p. 1–16.
Wilhelm, A. (2000). Democracy in the digital age: challenges to political life in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
Witschge, T. (2008). Examining online public discourse in context: a mixed method approach. Javnost-the public, 15, 2, 2008, 75-92.
Wood, M. & Flinders, M. (2014). Rethinking depoliticisation: beyond the governmental. Policy & Politics, 42(2), 151-170.
Wright, S. & Street, J. (2007). Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums. New media & society, v. 9, n. 5, p. 849-869.
Wyatt, R. O.; Kim. E. & Kim. J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of communication, v. 50, n. 1, p. 71-92.